Quality Assurance in the NatHERS industry

by | Oct 29, 2019 | NatHERS

Quality Assurance is a term used in the NatHERS industry that can cause fear in even the most accomplished Assessor.  It is not supposed to do this and is spruiked as a way of improving all Assessors, educating those falling behind, driving policy and influencing CPD topics. 

Quality Assurance (QA), as we know it, is a strange phenomenon. It is something that we all agree to be part of, that sounds like an excellent idea, until we are the one being reviewed. It starts a string of rhetorical questions like, ‘why me?’, ‘what did I do wrong?’, ‘what if I did make a mistake?’, ‘what if I loose my accreditation?’ through to ‘does the reviewer know what they are doing?’, ‘maybe another AAO would be go easier on me?’, ‘how does this work?’ and the list goes on. In my experience as an assessor, reviewer, policy writer and QA co-ordinator (aka candidate selector) the questions on the working side of the fence appear to be negative and fearful.  Whilst on the reviewing side of the fence, the intent is good but maybe a little unintentionally oblivious to its impact. 

Let’s look more closely at QA in the NatHERS Industry.  

QA forms a large of the Protocol for Assessors Accrediting Associations or NatHERS Protocol. In a nutshell, the Protocol requires that Assessor Accrediting Organisations (AAOs):

·       Have a professional Code of Practice, to which all Assessors are signatories,

·       Meet certain levels of Assessor review,

·       Have, and apply, a disciplinary policy, and

·       Report annually to the NatHERS National Administrator


To my knowledge, we are the only industry professionals that have our work checked down to the level of individual calculations and software data. This statement covers many other industries where mathematical calculation and/or software data entry. This extends to building industry professionals like Engineers and Architects, Financial Industry Professions such as Accountants and Stock Brokers, and Medical Industry professionals like Doctors and Nurses prescribing life-saving medications.  

In other industries there may be a peer review or a quick colleague check but this is nothing like what we do. We are required to send plans, software files, notes and issued documents. This is done, even if we have done nothing wrong.  Does this mean that we are over-policed? Are we trail blazers or not being recognised as ‘professional’ by government and our own industry associations? 

In my experience, NatHERS Assessors are, in general, not regarded highly by the professionals around them. More often than not, energy efficiency is something left until later in the project, rather than a NatHERS consultant being appointed at the beginning. This has improved, but given we have been around, and a mandatory part of the application process for nearly 25 years, the recognition by our peers is comparatively low. 

Quality assurance in the NatHERS industry is a time consuming and costly process for the AAO. It identifies areas of weakness that can help facilitate CPD development, locate Assessors that are not acting appropriately and possibly bring disrepute to us all. Equally, it can show Assessors that excel at what they do and have the potential to become reviewers themselves. The issue is that it sometimes identifies people who are good at what they do, made a few silly mistakes leading to temporary suspension and the associated effects, such as loss of income and clients subsequently resulting in irreversible effects that flow on to their company.

Don’t get me wrong, I believe Assessors should be accountable for their actions. Some questions arising are:

o   Are the current checking methods the right approach?

o   Is our Certificate IV qualification inadequate to demonstrate ability?

o   Should we aim for a single Industry Association like the Institute of Architects, Building Designers Association or Engineers Australia?

o   Could an Industry Association liaise with other associations to spread the word about reporting of unprofessional or questionable behaviour or knowledge? 

Quality Assurance in NatHERS definitely identifies Assessors that should not be operating. Equally, there could be Assessors flying under the radar. It sometimes targets the wrong people. There is variability in the knowledge and style of the reviewers. It can result in mandatory mentoring, from which AAOs generate income potentially this a conflict of interest? 

Is there another approach that could be used that allows assessors to be recognised and respected as skilled professionals whilst operating with a greater amount of autonomy?  

Leave your thoughts below.

Recent Blog Posts Testimonials

“I also want to take the opportunity to thank you for all your help during my studies. I think your training company is very professional and I would endorse you and Transformed to anyone looking to study distance learning”

Doug Madarovski

“I am very satisfy with the study”

Eric Lam

“Easy to deal with”

Laura Lace

“I found the course easy to follow and navigate through. I would recommend this course to others”

August 2018

“Ease of delivery, completing from work”

Qld Health

“Phenomenal course to understand contract management in the best way possible. I am working as a Procurement Manager and never understood contract part completely but this course helped me to understand key points of contract management. Thanks to author for creating this wonderful course. ”

Student - Introduction to Contract Management - August 2021

“Always good and prompt feedback from Michael”

John Logan
Draft Comps Services

“All round I’ve been really impressed with how professional everyone at Transformed has been”

Diploma of PM

“Learning – I have now fine-tuned my existing skills”

Brian Peterson
Moreton Bay Regional Council

“…I originally enrolled in Transformed’s Diploma of Project Management on the basis of their flexibility. ..As I subsequently discovered, Transformed’s approach extends even further to include ‘one on one’ coaching sessions… and adjusting the training to fit in with the client..”

Michael Irwin

“Working at my own pace online and the response time to emails and responses were always great”

Ekaterina Sidorova
Lend Lease

“Don has been a terrific teacher and very prompt with feedback throughout the whole diploma, which has been great!”

Diploma of PM

“I want to thank you for providing that encouragement and feed back at appropriate times. You make me and I’m sure all students, feel special and like we are getting personal assistance, which I have received. I don’t know how you manage all that you do but you do it well. Thank you”

Cert IV in NatHERS Assessment student

“My assessor was absolutely fantastic and I couldn’t have achieved this without her encouragement and guidance’.

Cert IV in Procurement & Contracting - March 2022

“The self-paced learning it allowed me to work whilst studying”

Haylea Edwards
Efficient Living

“I’m extremely impressed by The Cert IV in HEES delivered by Transformed. It is a fantastic, relevant, and interesting course with great content. The study materials and assistance have been exceptional. Thanks again to Transformed for their support”.

Matt Wade
Cert IV in HEES Student – April 2022.

“Just wanted to say thank you so much for offering such a great course, I have really enjoyed studying my Certificate IV in Home Energy Efficiency and Sustainability with Transformed”.

Cert IV in HEES student, July 2021

“Just wanted to say thanks for putting up with me and getting me over the line!! Which I know was a bit difficult with no background in the industry!! Thanks very much and I look forward to starting my business and conquering the world as an Energy Rater!”

Laura Lace

“I engaged Michael Young from Transformed to assess me for the Australian Institute of Project Management Certified Practicing Project Manager. I wanted to be certified as I wanted to verify that the skills and knowledge was in line with industry best-practice. At first it seemed a bit daunting, however, Michael made the process very easy, providing templates for references and self-assessment as well as providing a list of the project management documents I would need to provide as evidence. The assessment interview was very relaxed and more like a conversation than an assessment, which brought out the best experiences to evidence my capabilities. Because of Michael’s current government security clearance, we were able to look at specific of particular projects, rather me than having to spend a heap of time sanitising documents. Since the assessment, I have been successful in gaining a promotion..”

Mike McCarthy

“The excellent and prompt communication from my assessor”

Cert IV in NatHERS Assessment student

“I think everything worked very smoothly”

Susan Mariott
Quality Home Design and Drafting Service

“The most practical and well organised course I’ve been involved with, perfect for anyone with a demanding full time career and family commitments. My facilitator was extremely helpful and being part of the construction industry applied a very focused approach to the course content which assisted me in completing my studies, Would strongly and have already recommended Transformed to those looking to complete their Cert IV and Diploma in Building and Construction. Thanks for all your efforts and support.”

Aleks Petrovic
Cert IV and Diploma in Building and Construction Student

“I am so appreciative of you and Transformed for your flexibility and support- THANK YOU”

Louise Anderson
Cert IV in P & C student - May 2020

“Thanks for your support over the years and I look forward to doing more courses at Transformed in the future”.

Cert IV in HEES - March 2022

“The course is really well organised, your videos and zoom meetings were extremely helpful, the platform functions perfectly, your response time to queries and questions is always prompt and overall it is just been a wonderful experience”

Cert IV in HEES student, July 2021.