Why become an accredited NatHERS Assessor?

by | May 9, 2019 | NatHERS

This week our guest contributor Rebecca Robins discusses the issues around accredited and non-accredited NatHERS Assessors.

In the NatHERS world there are two types of Assessors; those of us who are accredited and those who are not.

The interesting thing about this is that it is a unique situation within the construction and other industries in Australia. It presents some interesting challenges for the industry, especially when it comes to consistency and comparison.

NatHERS is a relatively new industry in construction industry terms. It wasn’t until NatHERS Assessors came along in the late 90’s that the major Australian builders realised that putting insulation in walls was a good way to achieve their minimum compliance.

So, that was over 20 years ago. There was one very simple software package option and none of us were accredited, just trained. Towards the end of the century and as assessor numbers grew, various State, private organisations and people worked to at least mandated minimum training standards, usually followed by an exam. Quality assurance was also introduced at this point.

Now we move forward to the present day. Many of the State bodies have moved away from managing Assessors, leaving it up to the Assessor Accrediting Organisations (AAO), ABSA, BDAV and more recently HERA. The AAO’s are then required to ensure Assessors practice under the guidelines of the National NatHERS Administrator (NatHERS).

The big issue is, not all assessors have to be accredited. Somewhere from 1997 until now, real consistency in assessor activities has been lost.

If you look at accreditation, licencing, Board admission or even membership of professional bodies, in general, Australian service providers must hold one or more of these to be able to practice their trade.  This tells the consumer that the person they have hired has the qualifications, knowledge and insurance to do their job. If we go beyond construction and look at say, your local accountant you want to see the degree on the wall and that they are a Certified Practicing Accountant (CPA).

And then there is us.

The States and Territories control whether NatHERS Assessors must be accredited. The only two jurisdictions to have done this are NSW and the ACT (Licencing). A number of others ‘highly recommend it’ or state that, as per the NCC, ‘persons conducting assessments must be suitably qualified and one way of demonstrating this is to be accredited with an AAO’. The second method was successful for many years in encouraging accreditation but once the loophole was exposed, (around 2014-15) accreditation in those states dropped significantly, almost to the point of non-existence.

The NatHERS Protocol spells out how ACCREDITED Assessors are to be quality assured, signed to a Code of Practice, insured, disciplined and practice under the guidelines as set out by NatHERS. But what about those deeming themselves ‘suitably qualified’.  These ‘assessors’ are supposed to abide by their software users licence agreement and purchase certificates, but what isn’t known is how the assessment has been done. There are no requirements to follow the Technical Note. Can building A and building B done by an accredited and non-accredited Assessor really be compared if consistency cannot be guaranteed?

It raises more and more questions, advantages, disadvantages and possible solutions:

  • Why are we the only industry that does not require accreditation?
  • Why won’t some jurisdictions require accreditation of NatHERS Assessors?
  • Why are accredited Assessors so strictly quality assured when unaccredited assessors operate in an unregulated environment?
  • Are accredited assessors and their clients being unfairly disadvantaged financially and in ability to derive desired results amongst other things?
  • What information or guidelines does a non-accredited Assessor used when faced with tricky data entry?
  • Is the goal of the NCC really being achieved when we estimate more than 50% of assessors are unaccredited?
  • Could the Federal Government take over this part of the building legislation when the rest is State and Territory controlled?
  • Would a bottom up approach work? i.e. start at Local Government level (it’s actually how NatHERS came into NSW)
  • Would including at least a Certificate IV in the software licence agreement help?

Most importantly it begs the question ‘Are consumers getting what they pay for?’

I am sure you can think of more advantages, disadvantages and possible solutions – please add to the comments section below.

Recent Blog Posts Testimonials

“Just wanted to say thanks for putting up with me and getting me over the line!! Which I know was a bit difficult with no background in the industry!! Thanks very much and I look forward to starting my business and conquering the world as an Energy Rater!”

Laura Lace

“Always good and prompt feedback from Michael”

John Logan
Draft Comps Services

“Working at my own pace online and the response time to emails and responses were always great”

Ekaterina Sidorova
Lend Lease

“The excellent and prompt communication from my assessor”

Cert IV in NatHERS Assessment student

“I’m extremely impressed by The Cert IV in HEES delivered by Transformed. It is a fantastic, relevant, and interesting course with great content. The study materials and assistance have been exceptional. Thanks again to Transformed for their support”.

Matt Wade
Cert IV in HEES Student – April 2022.

“Don has been a terrific teacher and very prompt with feedback throughout the whole diploma, which has been great!”

Diploma of PM

“My assessor was absolutely fantastic and I couldn’t have achieved this without her encouragement and guidance’.

Cert IV in Procurement & Contracting - March 2022

“I also want to take the opportunity to thank you for all your help during my studies. I think your training company is very professional and I would endorse you and Transformed to anyone looking to study distance learning”

Doug Madarovski

“All round I’ve been really impressed with how professional everyone at Transformed has been”

Diploma of PM

“I think everything worked very smoothly”

Susan Mariott
Quality Home Design and Drafting Service

“Learning – I have now fine-tuned my existing skills”

Brian Peterson
Moreton Bay Regional Council

“Easy to deal with”

Laura Lace

“The self-paced learning it allowed me to work whilst studying”

Haylea Edwards
Efficient Living

“I want to thank you for providing that encouragement and feed back at appropriate times. You make me and I’m sure all students, feel special and like we are getting personal assistance, which I have received. I don’t know how you manage all that you do but you do it well. Thank you”

Cert IV in NatHERS Assessment student

“Thanks for your support over the years and I look forward to doing more courses at Transformed in the future”.

Cert IV in HEES - March 2022

“Phenomenal course to understand contract management in the best way possible. I am working as a Procurement Manager and never understood contract part completely but this course helped me to understand key points of contract management. Thanks to author for creating this wonderful course. ”

Student - Introduction to Contract Management - August 2021

“The most practical and well organised course I’ve been involved with, perfect for anyone with a demanding full time career and family commitments. My facilitator was extremely helpful and being part of the construction industry applied a very focused approach to the course content which assisted me in completing my studies, Would strongly and have already recommended Transformed to those looking to complete their Cert IV and Diploma in Building and Construction. Thanks for all your efforts and support.”

Aleks Petrovic
Cert IV and Diploma in Building and Construction Student

“I engaged Michael Young from Transformed to assess me for the Australian Institute of Project Management Certified Practicing Project Manager. I wanted to be certified as I wanted to verify that the skills and knowledge was in line with industry best-practice. At first it seemed a bit daunting, however, Michael made the process very easy, providing templates for references and self-assessment as well as providing a list of the project management documents I would need to provide as evidence. The assessment interview was very relaxed and more like a conversation than an assessment, which brought out the best experiences to evidence my capabilities. Because of Michael’s current government security clearance, we were able to look at specific of particular projects, rather me than having to spend a heap of time sanitising documents. Since the assessment, I have been successful in gaining a promotion..”

Mike McCarthy

“I am so appreciative of you and Transformed for your flexibility and support- THANK YOU”

Louise Anderson
Cert IV in P & C student - May 2020

“The course is really well organised, your videos and zoom meetings were extremely helpful, the platform functions perfectly, your response time to queries and questions is always prompt and overall it is just been a wonderful experience”

Cert IV in HEES student, July 2021.

“I found the course easy to follow and navigate through. I would recommend this course to others”

August 2018

“…I originally enrolled in Transformed’s Diploma of Project Management on the basis of their flexibility. ..As I subsequently discovered, Transformed’s approach extends even further to include ‘one on one’ coaching sessions… and adjusting the training to fit in with the client..”

Michael Irwin

“Just wanted to say thank you so much for offering such a great course, I have really enjoyed studying my Certificate IV in Home Energy Efficiency and Sustainability with Transformed”.

Cert IV in HEES student, July 2021

“Ease of delivery, completing from work”

Qld Health

“I am very satisfy with the study”

Eric Lam